Manufacturer
The Manufacturer is the economic operator carrying the core PPWR conformity responsibility for the packaging or packaged product. Commission guidance describes this as one economic operator EU-wide.
Two Representatives · Two Different Jobs
Both contain the words “Authorised Representative”. That causes the confusion. One belongs to the Manufacturer / conformity side. The other belongs to the Producer / packaging EPR side.
A Manufacturer Authorised Representative is appointed by the Manufacturer under PPWR Article 17 for specified conformity and authority-facing tasks. An EPR Authorised Representative is appointed by the Producer for extended producer responsibility obligations in a particular Member State.
Start here
Under PPWR, “Manufacturer” answers the conformity question. “Producer” answers the packaging-waste responsibility question. They can be the same business — but they do not have to be.
The Manufacturer is the economic operator carrying the core PPWR conformity responsibility for the packaging or packaged product. Commission guidance describes this as one economic operator EU-wide.
Producer is the EPR role. It is determined according to the Member State, packaging flow and route to market. The Producer is responsible for the EPR obligations where that packaging is expected to become waste.
Now compare the representatives
One visual rule
Case Study 1
The glass decoration is the product. The box, protective paper, insert, film, tape and shipping materials are the packaging. Now follow the two PPWR roles separately.
Case Study 2 · Importers
Now use a more common SME example. Two European businesses buy the same packaged outdoor products from Turkey. One sells only in Germany. The other sells in Poland and directly to customers in Czechia.
Camping accessories, trekking equipment, outdoor cooking accessories or similar products.
Under these assumptions, the Turkish supplier remains the Manufacturer of its own branded packaged product.
The German company is an Importer in Germany. The Polish business is an Importer in Poland.
This changes by market and sales route. The same Polish business can therefore be Producer in Poland and Czechia.
Polish business imports and first makes the packaged products available in Poland.
The same Polish business sells directly to a Czech end user.
Change one fact
The Polish business is now supplying an independent Czech reseller rather than the Czech end user. For the packaged-product flow in this simplified example, the Czech reseller can become the Producer when it first makes the packaged products available on the Czech market.
So the Polish company's Czech EPR representative conclusion can change even though the physical product and packaging did not change.
Our importer example assumes the Turkish supplier's own brand. If the German or Polish buyer commissions the packaging or packaged product under its own name or trademark, check the PPWR Manufacturer definition again. Do not apply the importer example automatically to a private-label supply chain.
SME detail
Article 3(13)(b) contains a specific exception where a micro-enterprise has packaging or a packaged product made under its own name or trademark and the packaging supplier is located in the same Member State. Where the statutory conditions are met, that packaging supplier is treated as the Manufacturer.
This exception changes the Manufacturer analysis. It does not remove the need to determine the EPR Producer separately for every relevant Member State.
Final comparison
| QUESTION | MANUFACTURER AR | EPR AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE |
|---|---|---|
| Legal basis | PPWR Article 17 | PPWR Article 45 / Chapter VIII |
| Acts for | Manufacturer | Producer |
| Main question | Is the packaging compliant? | Who operates packaging EPR in this country? |
| Main subject | Conformity | Packaging waste / EPR |
| Geography | EU conformity role | Member-State-specific EPR role |
| Representative location | Established in the Union | Established in the relevant Member State |
| Automatically required for every cross-border sale? | No | Can be mandatory; current Article 45(3) requires it for specified cross-border Producers |
| Technical documentation | Authority-access role under mandate | Not its core purpose |
| EU Declaration of Conformity | Authority-access role under mandate | Not its core purpose |
| Producer register | Not Article 17's purpose | Relevant to EPR role |
| PRO / EPR system | No | Yes, where applicable |
| Packaging quantities | Not an EPR declaration role | Used for EPR reporting |
| EPR contributions | No | Part of EPR framework |
| Does Importer automatically equal this AR? | No | No — Producer status and representation must be determined separately |
Remember only this
Manufacturer
↓
Article 17 Manufacturer AR
Producer
↓
Article 45 EPR Authorised Representative
Primary Sources
Simple FAQ
No. Manufacturer AR belongs to the Article 17 conformity role. EPR Authorised Representative belongs to the Producer's Chapter VIII extended producer responsibility role.
No. Article 17 says the Manufacturer may appoint an Authorised Representative by written mandate. Cross-border sales do not themselves create one Manufacturer AR per destination country.
No. Importer and Manufacturer Authorised Representative are separate PPWR roles. The Importer has its own Article 18 obligations. Manufacturer AR status requires a separate written mandate.
Yes. A company established in a Member State that imports packaged products from a third country and first makes them available in that Member State can be the Producer there.
In our example the German company itself is the Producer and is already established in Germany. The EPR relationship is therefore operated by the Germany-established Producer rather than by a foreign Producer through a German representative.
Because it is established in Poland but directly makes packaged products available to end users in Czechia. Under the current Article 45(3) framework, the resulting Czech Producer relationship requires an EPR Authorised Representative in Czechia.
The EPR result can change. Where the Polish company supplies an independent Czech reseller rather than the end user, the Czech reseller can become the Producer when it first makes the packaged products available on the Czech market.
Yes. Producer is a Member-State-specific EPR role. A Polish business can be Producer in Poland for domestic sales and also be Producer in Czechia for direct cross-border sales to Czech end users.
It can change the Manufacturer analysis. If the EU business has packaging or a packaged product designed or manufactured under its own name or trademark, the PPWR Manufacturer definition must be checked again.
No. Article 17 keeps core Manufacturer obligations, including the Article 15(1) obligations and drawing up the Annex VII technical documentation, outside the representative's mandate.
First identify the Manufacturer. Then the Importer. Then determine the Producer in each destination country. Only after that can the correct representative question be answered.